I don’t like to argue.
Not seriously, anyway. A lot of
times when I “hijack” a comment thread on Facebook, it is because someone has
posted something that borders on controversial.
There are usually a lot of comments going back and forth in favor one
idea or another. I almost always have an
opinion. I almost never genuinely share
it.
Since the massacre of children in Connecticut, there have
been roughly 2 schools of thought on how to keep it from happening again:
1) More guns.
2) Less guns.
Both sides want to
somehow blame the heartbreaking tragedy on the philosophy of the other side.
Both sides agree that the number of guns is wrong.
I hate these sorts of arguments. They never go anywhere. Neither side will concede a valid point by
the other.
I’ve always enjoyed considering all sides of an
argument. I hear it’s called wishy-washy
to change your opinion. I guess that’s
what I am. See that? I “guess”.
Take a stand, Cube!
When you stubbornly hold to an opinion, you miss out on some
really cool stuff. In fact, I’d say if
your opinion is not movable, it is not an opinion. It is faith.
There’s a difference. There’s nothing
(much) wrong with faith in and of itself.
Just don’t call it your opinion.
It is something you’ve decided to believe regardless of any external evidence.
Sometimes people vow restricted behavior for the rest of
their lives in misguided loyalty to a position they held in some ridiculous
argument. I think this is done to be
the “winner” of the argument.
Here’s an example from real life:
There’s a man. Let’s
call him “Bob.” Bob likes chocolate ice
cream, but it is not his favorite kind of ice cream. His favorite kind of ice cream is
strawberry. It always has been his
favorite. Sometimes though, he purposely buys chocolate instead of strawberry, because he’s just
in the mood for chocolate.
Bob’s ex-friend, “Joe” prefers chocolate, with similar
feelings about strawberry that Bob has toward chocolate. Bob and Joe are talking about ice cream one
day and it ends up in an argument. To
illustrate his point, Bob never eats chocolate ice cream again and Joe never eats
strawberry again. What Bob and Joe just
did was not technically an argument. Technically,
it was just stupid.*
The members of the current incarnation of the U.P. lunch
ride have always been gracious enough to allow me to ride with them from time
to time on a strictly probationary basis. I was initially
required to be accompanied by a “sponsor.”
Someone who is a member of the ride who would be responsible for me or
who would vouch for me until such time that I was accepted into the group. This is for the safety of all involved. It is also a joke (literally), but anyway …
I have now been on enough rides with the members of the
group, that my probationary status has been lifted and I am considered a full-fledged
member of the group ride with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto,
yada yada yada.
Or at least I was. Until
the taco incident.
On Thursdays, the U.P. Lunch ride goes to a taco truck in
South Omaha. These are good tacos. I mean, it’s South Omaha. Duh.
I have always loved and appreciated all kinds of different
food. Mexican food is no exception. I have tried dozens of hole-in-the wall
places and big chains. Surprisingly,
sometimes the chains do a decent job.
Unfortunately, my vast taco experience damaged my membership
status on the group rides. I did not
know I had to agree with the group that those were the best tacos I ever
had. So yeah, I’m back on
probation. Probably permanently,
now. The taco truck tacos are
excellent. I said as much.
But in this black and white world of “It’s either the best
or it’s the worst. Too many guns or not
enough guns,” I’m once again, wishy-washy.
I can rate the tacos high without feeling the need to call
them the best ever – but not if I want to ride freely with The U.P. crowd.
Truth is, I’ve had tacos very similar to those from many
other places.
There is a range of taco goodness in my mind. It goes from roughly “Taco Bell” on the low
end to “Jose’s Mom’s tacos” on the high end.
There may be (and probably are) better tacos than what
Jose’s mom made, but I’ve never had them.
When I worked down at the Cajun restaurant downtown, there was a kid who worked there
named Jose. He had been born in
Mexico. His parents spoke no
English. He told me that he and his
brother learned to speak English from watching Kojak.
One day, he brought in a cookie sheet full of tiny little
tacos. They were simply a thick homemade
flour shell with some seasoned ground beef inside. There was no cheese, sour cream, tomatoes,
cilantro, or any other chunky thing in the tacos. The shells were dark with oil. The tacos had been baked on the pan all
overlapping each other. I’ve never had a
taco close to as good as those.
In 1986, I was commuting to Butsy Le Doux’s (The Cajun
restaurant) on my new Bianchi Campione D’Italia. So I carried a dozen or so of those tacos
home in a paper sack where my roommate and I ate them and stared at each other,
marveling at their unbelievable
deliciousness.
Tacos so good that 25 years later, they alter my social
status among a group of local bike riders.
I don’t care who you are, you have to admit that’s a damn good
taco.
But that’s not what I came here to talk about.
I used to work as a computer operator at a place called
Intellisell. I had been there for a
couple of years when we got this new guy as a Computer operator. His name was Sean. He and I quickly became pretty good
friends. We had a lot in common. Especially taste in Movies. I was always glad to get a thumbs up review
from Sean on a movie.
“Hey Cube, I saw the most funniest, awesomest, hilariousest
movie of all time past, present and future last night!”
“Oh Sean, You must tell me what it is so that I may rent it
and enjoy it as well!”
“They have it at Blockbuster. It is called ‘So, I married an Axe Murderer,’”
“Great. I’ve heard of
it. It had that Wayne’s World guy in it,
right?”
“Yeah. You’ll love it.”
“I’ll rent it tonight!
Yaay!”
So the next day I didn’t really bring it up. I liked the movie ok, but it was just more of
Mike Myers doing his thing, which is fine, but nothing real earth
shattering. Here’s the hard part. I didn’t love it. I didn’t think it was must-see. I didn’t think it was an instant classic.
Sean hit the roof. I
didn’t have any sense of humor. I had no
taste in movies. Pearl Jam is the most
overrated band of all time, etc. etc. I
tried to explain that I did like it ok, but overall, it didn’t really do it for
me.
A few months later, I was at school (UNO), and somebody was
giving out passes to see “Paramount Pictures, Braveheart.” There were
instructions to show up a half hour early to ensure getting a seat. So I went with my ex-wife (she wasn’t my
ex-wife yet) . I loved that movie. I thought it was one of the best movies I had
ever seen. I was very excited to tell
Sean about it. I knew he’d love it. He was of Scottish descent and that was a big
part of what he liked so much about “Axe Murderer.”
Since I had seen it as a promotional thing, the movie wasn’t
actually out yet. So even if Sean wanted
to see it, he couldn’t. That didn’t
matter though. He told me that he would
not see it because if I liked it and didn’t like “So I Married an Axe Murderer”
it was only logical that he would hate it.
Well it wasn’t logical.
Here’s why: If Sean liking a
movie is A, and me Liking a movie is B, then me not liking a movie is ~B and
Sean not liking a movie is ~A.
If (as in one case)
A -> ~B
Then Sean is saying B -> ~A, which is the classic modus
tollens, and fair enough. But here’s the
problem. Up until the “Axe Murderer”
fiasco, Sean and I had agreed on many movies that we both felt were “quite
excellent”. So clearly, his assertion “A
->~B” is false. It’s as if he’s
saying “every time it’s cloudy, it rains.”
Well sometimes it doesn’t rain, Sean. Sometimes it snows. Sometimes it snows.
Then Braveheart came out for the general public to see. They (the general public) loved it. Sean’s wife really wanted to go see it
because all of her friends were telling her how good it was and how much they
thought Sean would love it because he loves all things Scottish. But Sean stood firm. “If Cube likes it,” he insisted, “I shall not
see this movie.”
At this point, I really didn’t care if he saw the movie or
not. I think if I had said, “Oh hey
Sean. I just found out I had low blood
sugar that was messing with my sense of humor the day I saw the Mike Myers
film, so I watched it again and you know what?
It might be the funniest movie I’ve ever seen. Haggis! Oh my god. I know, right? That’s some funny shit.” Then Sean would have
feigned illness, called his wife and been in the front row for the very next
showing of Braveheart. But yeah, I
didn’t do that for him.
Then a few more months went by and the Academy Award
nominations came out. At that time, the
one thing that Sean and I had always done (not together – but we shared a
similar love of film) was go see every movie nominated for best picture. This way, we’d have our own informed opinion
when the winner was announced.
I was not surprised when Braveheart was nominated. What I couldn’t believe was the power of
stubbornness. Sean – you are not hurting
me. I’ve seen the movie. I don’t care if you do or not. But he wouldn’t.
I asked him if he’d go see it if it won for best
picture. He told me there was no
point. He wouldn’t like it. As I write this, I feel like I’m making it
up. But this is pretty much exactly as
it progressed. Also, as this went on, I went from ‘kind of liking So I Married an Axe
Murderer’ to thinking it was the worst piece of trash ever put to celluloid. Every chance I got, I talked about what a
travesty it was that “Braveheart” won for best picture and “So I Married an Axe
Murderer” wasn’t even nominated for anything at all. This didn’t move Sean to want to see
Braveheart and by this point, I didn’t want him to watch it. I’d come in to work and say, “Hey Sean, I
watched “Braveheart” and “Axe Murderer” last night. One hilarious and one excellent movie, I’ll
tell ya.
Which brings me to the point of this post. The Oscars are this weekend and I don’t
give a shit.
*Stupid because chocolate ice cream is far superior to
strawberry. There can be no discussion
on this. Anyone who thinks differently
is an idiot.
4 comments:
Those tacos are way better than Braveheart, and good luck finding a sponsor now!
Those tacos are made from haggis and you know it.
Yeah pretty good, but what if Jose's Mom's tacos were made of William Wallace's quartered entrails? Modus Tollens that, buddy.
One time I was in San Antonio for a training seminar on a certain type of new IVR system. After a long day at the seminar, we all decided to cut loose a little bit on the meager stipend from out respective companies. We went to a little Cajun Restaurant that specialized in Alligator tail. I thought is was delicious. It was not until later that we found out that the place was a vampire den, run by, you guessed it, an undead Charlie Burton. He explained that tha Alligator tail I liked so much was actually the quartered entrails of Billy Newman, his previous drummer. In conclusion, the best alligator tail I've ever had was the quartered entrails of a drummer for Charlie Burton (and the inspiration for his new band, "The cutouts"), therefore it seems likely You've stumbled upon Jose's mom's secret ingredient.
Post a Comment